I wouldnt call this cheese, i rather call it “youre opponent being dumb”. If youre opponent agrees to have that piece be set up as terrain and you start playing the game its the opponents own fault for letting you use that big gun.

And you two actually believe that someone would allow you to do that? “Yes Darrell, you can put your 10 DMLs on your half of the board as a terrain piece. I don’t mind at all”.

There’s no cheese in here – only stupidity.

I agree, gilgamesh. No fun. Although it would be kind of fun if there were guns scattered around the table. Maybe you are fighting in an abandoned weapons yard or something.

I think I found some Sisters of Battle cheese!

Most entries for replacing a boltgun with another weapon, reads “Up to one (blank) may replace her boltgun with one of the following:”, except for the Celestians.

Their entry reads, “One Celestian may replace her boltgun with one of the following:” It doesn’t say “Up to one may replace…” or “Only one may replace…”, so does that mean you can have a unit of 9 Heavy Flamers, or 9 Meltaguns, or 9 Stormbolters, etc?

Is that too cheesey? I wouldn’t do it myself, but I’m wondering if Darrell would?

some guys at my local club used to use similair rules to gun emplacements in 5th and were thrilled that they were now in the new rules many built them as faction specialist stuff e.g. and ork player built a crazty rokkit lobba thing and our tau player built the railgun emplacement….Our eldar player built my favourite though the d cannon emplacement from dawn of war! I’m currently trying to build some emplacements for a game i hope to play soon but it’s a bit frustrating…. would still reccomend it though the one i’ve finished was a very rewarding experience.

This video was bad, and you should feel bad for posting such rubbish.

For starters, as pointed above, on page 96 it clearly states that neutral buildings count as “dilapidated” and their attendant gun emplacements are non-functioning.

Secondly, assuming that weren’t the case, the only three types of people would fall for this:

This video was bad, and you should feel bad for posting such rubbish. For starters, as pointed above, on page 96 it clearly states that neutral buildings count as “dilapidated” and their attendant gun emplacements are non-functioning. Secondly, assuming that weren’t the case, the only three types of people would fall for this: 1.) Complete newbs who had no idea that there would be a significance to you mysteriously plopping all sorts of heavy weapons down on the board 2.) Children aged 12 and below 3.) Individuals afflicted with Downs Syndrome whom are on a field trip from the group… Read more »