Spellcrow Go Hunting With New Fantasy Elves
February 8, 2017 by brennon
The folks at Spellcrow have now released four new Elves onto their webstore for your Fantasy games. Wielding daggers and axes they looking like some proficient killers!
Firstly we have these becloaked warriors with daggers drawn. Both Version One and Version Two of these models look like they would make for excellent Elven Rogues in your games of Dungeons & Dragons.
Of the two of them, I prefer the first simply because I think his overall look meshes nicer Something about the cloak for the second Elf just doesn't look as cool.
Getting stuck in with the chopping implements we also have two Elves with axes.
This pair is no less roughish than the previous Elves and indeed could probably make for some good hired swords, ready to do the dirty work in the back alleys of a Fantasy city.
Of Version One and Version Two I think I prefer the second due to the hairstyle which makes him look even more angry! If you picked up a few of these you could use them as a group of vagabonds in Dungeons & Dragons once again, or as part of a larger Fantasy warband.
What do you think of these new Elves?
"...they would make for excellent Elven Rogues in your games of Dungeons & Dragons"
Supported by (Turn Off)
Supported by (Turn Off)
Supported by (Turn Off)
Not really all that thrilled with these. The proportions seem a bit funny. Not up to GW’s high elf standard (the old plastic boxed sets, anyway), IMO.
More or less I like them. The fella at the bottom needs work on his jawline though.
To be honest these are not so good. We have seen plenty lot better ones in past from other companies.
Agree here too some of their stuff is fantastic like pumpkins faction fir the\ir game Umbra but elves need more work.
They aren’t bad sculpts, but look (in my deluded mind) more like half-elves than elves, The Build and stance is a bit too human.
They aren’t too bad. They remind me of old GW sculpts- maybe that’s a bad thing.
Some of the worst models I’ve seen and elves, come on, really. I don’t think so