Operation “Sea Lion” Invading England In 1940? [Part Four]
November 28, 2016 by crew
Good afternoon, Beasts of War. Once more we push deeper into our alternate history of Operation Sea Lion, the proposed German invasion of Great Britain in September, 1940. By gathering research and running a series of wargames, we hope to make some educated guesses about the engagements such an invasion might’ve produced.
So far, we’ve taken an introductory overview of Sea Lion in Part One. In Part Two we launched the invasion with German glider drops and beach landings. In Part Three we saw more landings by the Germans further west and the results of the first concentrated British counterattack.
Now we continue this harrowing tale of “what-if” history, watching what happens as “Unternehmen Seelöwe” enters its most critical stages. Does Britain fall? Does the Third Reich complete its lightning conquest of western Europe?
S-DAY +12
The Battle of Ashford
For almost two weeks now, German armies have clawed out a tenuous foothold on the coasts of Sussex and Kent. Initially successful landings have bogged down in claustrophobic villages and farmland, while supply problems and casualties continue to mount. Just to take a quick historical side note: does any of this sound familiar yet?
As the last days of September slip away, the Germans resolve to break things loose, and at last, they have the forces to do it. In the Sixteenth Army’s sector, XLVI Motorised Corps has finally managed a landing, over a week behind schedule because British defenders have blown up over a dozen ships to block the harbour facilities at Dover.
Nevertheless, by September 27th the German 10th Panzer Division stands ready for the climactic break-out. Their attack will fall at Ashford in Kent, currently held by the New Zealand Division. It is hoped this assault will rupture the thin Allied defence line and at last tear open the road to London.
Banking heavily on this success, the Germans also allocate much of their remaining air strength to the Ashford assault. They also commit the “Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler” motorised regiment, fanatical Waffen SS troops originally drawn from the Führer’s personal bodyguard. Soldiers just don’t come any better...or worse.
The British, however, have a few cards up their sleeve as well. For one, their intelligence on German plans is superb, thanks to intercepts of German “Enigma-coded” communications. Originally provided by Polish agents right before the war started, these Enigma ciphers practically allow British code-breakers a place at the German generals’ table.
With plenty of warning, the British have time to mobilise forces to meet the attack. Elements of the 1st Canadian Division are moved in beside the New Zealanders, along with rearmed French troops from Dunkirk and even Free Poles. A powerful armoured force is also ready, the 22nd Heavy Armoured Brigade, part of the 2nd Armoured Division.
The Battle of Ashford is a titanic clash, erupting into divisional-scale fury on September 27th, 1940 and burning its name into the history books forever. Even the Royal Air Force manages a showing, with rebuilt squadrons put back into the air from airfields in Yorkshire, with venerable Hurricanes fending off He-111s trying to bomb Kiwi infantry.
Losses, especially among the Allied infantry battalions holding the line, are horrendous. But once the Matildas and A13 cruisers of the 22nd Heavy Armoured Brigade show up, the 10th Panzer has lost the day. Although not a clear win, Ashford at least ensures that the big German breakthrough will not come in Kent. As for Sussex, however…
Special thanks to community member @yavasa for the idea of British defenders blowing up ships in occupied harbours, @jamesevans140 for the idea of rearmed Free French troops, and @cpauls1 for the idea of the Princess Patricia’s Light Infantry Regiment representing 1st Canadian Division in this battle.
S-DAY +20
The Battle of Crowborough
In this alternate timeline of World War II, future British historians will not write quite so much about the Battles of El Alamein, Sword Beach, Operation Goodwood, or Arnhem. They will write about the Battle of Crowborough, and compare it forever with moments like Hastings or the Spanish Armada. Britain’s fate turns … today.
The date is October 5th, 1940. The German situation is becoming dire. Worsening weather over the Channel is neutralizing the Luftwaffe’s ability to fend off the Royal Navy, which (despite grievous losses), still has two battleships and plenty of cruisers that don’t need sunny skies to maul the ramshackle German “supply fleet.”
A last, all-out offensive is prepared by the German Ninth Army in Sussex. The place chosen for the attack actually makes sense. With the British 1st Armoured Division largely chewed up at Burgess Hill to the west, and the 2nd Armoured committed at Ashford, there seems no real British tank reserves at the centre.
The Germans, however, are wrong. Desperately scrapping together recovered battlefield wrecks and half-finished tanks from the factories, stripping every territorial reserve unit and even the first battalion of 7th Armoured Division just returning from Egypt, the British have managed a patchwork tank force to meet this new German threat.
At 05:00 hours on October 5th, the German assault opens up. The massed howitzers and mortars of the entire XV Motorised Corps (Lieutenant-General Hermann Hoth) open fire along the British front in front of Crowborough. Gunfire can be heard as far away as Oxford, eighty miles away. At daybreak, the Luftwaffe joins the assault.
One of the most crucial sectors of this battle (over ten miles wide, extending from Chelwood Gate to Mayfield) is held by the 1st Royal Irish Fusiliers, part of the 134th Infantry Brigade of the 45th Division (I Corps, General Harold Alexander). They hold the road leading straight through Crowborough, and from there, London.
This sector is struck by the 35th Panzer and 12th Infantry Regiments of the 4th Panzer Division, and there’s been no time for the Irish Fusiliers to build field fortifications. Yet even as tank support arrives, attached to 29th Independent Brigade, the defenders know these are the LAST British armoured reserves. The British win today, or lose it all.
For the Germans, the situation is just as dire. Their tenuous supply links to occupied France are breaking down. Many of these tanks have only half-loads of ammunition. The men have been eating whatever animals they can shoot. Fuel is low. Broken-down vehicles can’t be repaired. And behind the lines, a Resistance is stirring to life.
For both sides, it’s now or never.
The fighting that day is predictably furious. Unsuitable British tanks like the A11 Infantry Tank and the Light Tank Mark VI prove little more than scrap metal to German antitank fire, just as PzKpfw Is prove to British 2-pounder guns. But the rest of the tanks lock horns in murderous combat, sometimes at ranges of less than 75 yards.
Artillery is soon removed from the equation, as commanders can no longer avoid hitting their own infantry squads, sometimes in hand-to-hand combat between the burning hulks of tanks. The Germans try to call in air strikes, but at last the Luftwaffe can provide no more. British radio jamming is also instrumental in neutralising this advantage.
Of course, the Irish Fusiliers and 29th Brigade are fighting only part of this battle. Over the horizon to the east and west, the Battle of Crowborough is fought by Scotsmen, Welshmen, Englishmen from the Borderlands to Portsmouth and Southampton, even a battalion of Czechs. This will be an Allied battle, and an Allied victory.
At the end of the day, the 4th Panzer has failed to crack the reeling (but intact) British line. Orders are issued for 7th Panzer Division to carry the assault forward the next day, but the precious handfuls of German supplies have already been consumed. Like most battles, this one is decided on the supply clerk’s clipboard as much as on the battlefield.
In many ways, the Allied win at Crowborough is more a political victory than military pragmatism. After all, the 4th Panzer Division is far from eliminated, and the Rommel’s 7th Panzer looms right behind it. But the Battles of Ashford and Crowborough show that the British and her allies can fight and beat the Germans on the ground.
The battles electrify British resolve. Here is where Winston Churchill becomes the icon of defiance (much as he did after the Battle of Britain in the real historical timeline). No more is there talk of ousting him from Parliament and cutting a deal. The British will fight, and thus comes the end of any real chance of German success.
Over the next few months, the Germans withdraw everything they can out of their English beachhead. Much of this is accomplished by air, as the RAF still can’t close off the skies to German air traffic and the British army remains far too weak to actually drive the Germans back into the sea.
By December of 1940, it’s all over. Germany has suffered its first land defeat in World War II. Tens of thousands have been killed or wounded, with almost 120,000 taken prisoner. Losses in heavy equipment are even worse, the “Channel Airlift” almost resembling a “Dunkirk in reverse.” In 1941, a weakened Germany will turn east.
Thus we come to the end of our Sea Lion campaign. Despite a rushed timeline, a weak Kriegsmarine, and the English Channel, unchallenged air supremacy initially allowed the Germans to secure a successful landing. Ironically, that turned out to be the easy part, as sustaining a large campaign across enemy-controlled water proved just too much.
Please remember, however, that we have one more part in our Sea Lion article series. In next week’s Part 5, we really take Sea Lion apart and try to make a detailed, point-by-point prognosis of its prospects. If it would have failed, we list WHY it would failed. If it could have succeeded, we look at HOW it could have done so.
There’ll be plenty of debate, and I think some of what’s presented will surprise many readers. For now, keep the conversation going with your own observations, comments, and questions. Could YOU have taken Britain? What other plans, campaigns, battles, and games have you seen or participated in? Does YOUR Britain stand or fall?
If you would like to write for Beasts of War then please contact us at [email protected] for more information.
"Now we continue this harrowing tale of “what-if” history, watching what happens as “Unternehmen Seelöwe” enters its most critical stages..."
Supported by (Turn Off)
Supported by (Turn Off)
"For both sides, it’s now or never..."
Supported by (Turn Off)
Thanks for this @oriskany
Was a pleasure to read.
Yay! first to post! 🙂
Thanks very much, @jamest123 . Glad you liked it! Pls remember, the campaign may be over, but we’ve got one more article in the series where we try to estimate just how likely this whole campaign really would have been, and what both sides would have to do to win.
I can’t help but think that we would have managed to defend our island whatever the cost my be. If only because of the improved nature of the German assault force compared to the RN who I’m sure would have destroyed themselves to stop the invasion/reinforcements I think that would also apply to the RAF whatever state it was in.
In the long run, I think I agree @darthcheese , as I hope I’ve demonstrated in this outcome. A German attempt at Sea Lion might have seen startling initial successes, but once it got into a “grinding” affair the advantages of the defender start to amplify, as do many of the inherent weaknesses of the German war machine in WW2 (lack of operational endurance, strategic depth, etc).
Again, next week’s conclusion really spreads all these factors out across the table, where we can look at them in greater detail and “alternate history prediction.”
Looking forward to that part.
😀
Cracking, well written article. Good to see you include forces from the rest of the allies and Commonwealth. This is often an area overlooked by the average Brit when talking about WW2 – just how much was given by our allies. Given such a defeat, it would be interesting to speculate how the rest of the war turned out. This defeat would weaken and demoralise, until that point, an unbeatable German army. Britain would clearly not be able to launch any sort of counter attack but I would imagine that German would have sued for peace again, although I expect… Read more »
Weakened Germans in Europe? Yes, of course. But also weakened british forces in N.-Africa. @oriskany mentioned forces from Egypt joining the fight at home. So maybe some more successful Italians?
Aggressive Stalin? Perhaps… but not until ’42 because of their army’s restructuring. The Germans could have been recovered until then. Very likely no “Operation Barbarossa” in ’41 though.
But I think more of that next week when part 5 is out.
Thanks, @redvers – and some interesting questions gong forward. The Commonwealth angle is almost a no-brainer. Our Sea Lion forum thread now includes a map that clearly shows the historical dispositions of all UK / CW divisions as of 11Sept1940 – and right there in the path of any drive toward London are the Canadian and New Zealand divisions. From there, of course, it’s not too tough to image Free Poles who fought in Narvik and France, and Free French units who escaped from Dunkirk. Who knows if Germany would have tried to sue for peace again? They certainly offered… Read more »
Thanks, @setesch – Definitely true about weakened British forces throughout the Empire. In our timeline, Sea Lion only lasts a few weeks. In that time, I dion’t think any of the Dominion Forces could have been brought back home (7th Armoured and 6th Australian from Egypt, 4th Indian from East Africa / Arabia, etc). So at least in this scenario, I think all those forces are still in place. Also, when Graziani’s 10th Army invades Egypt in September of 1940, he outnumbers O’Connor’s WDF (Western Desert Force) over 10-1. The British don’t really fight him, but pull back. The Italians… Read more »
http://www.beastsofwar.com/wp-content/uploads/forumfiles/sea-lion-26-british-defense-sept-1940.jpg
Again a great articles series.
It does make you think of how things could have gone.
Thanks very much, @caledor2 .
We do have one more coming, where we try taking a closer look at these “what if” factors in greater detail and see what really would have made a difference, and what wouldn’t.
@oriskany Another great article and a plausible outcome, from all accounts. Well written and well researched, as always. Let’s not forget the eye candy: beautiful work on the models! 🙂
Always good to see the Canadians stand up to the Waffen SS, eh? 😀 Thanks very much, @cpauls1 . Although I dunno about my models and miniatures, though. Now that Justin and John have put up their 28mm Sea Lion games . . . 😀
Great read as always.
And while the Germans come out of it weaker in the West. We also need to take into account that the SW of England been hit much much harder that it was in our timeline. Any production in that part of the country will take time to rebuilt.
I also can’t help but wonder if those last British armoured reserves included the A1E1.
God grief, @rasmus – look at this thing! I may not have a miniature of this thing to use in battlegroup, maybe I can proxy a T-35 I have for early War Soviets. Also, I can make up a Panzer Leader counter for this and try it out on the Historical Gaming Sea Lion thread. 😀
I had honestly never heard of this thing. Great find. 😀
Odd giant tanks, that might not be the most useful – is one thing that I seem to fall over and remember. I doubt any one ever made a mini for the A1E1 as it never saw service and only reached the prototype stage
Well, @rasmus – someone made a miniature of them, although I don’t know what scale it is (might be a scale model, too).
#sthash.EG7CAqqD.dpuf
I’m serious though. I’m making a Panzer Leader counter for these guys. The great thing about hexes and counters, especially electronic . . . you don’t spend days on “oddball” miniatures you’ll probably only use on the table once.
Concerning blockships the pre WWI HMS Hood was scuttled in Portland harbour as an anti submarine measure in 1914. She is still there more than a century later preventing use of the southern entrance to anything but small fishing boats and pleasure craft. You can just see the location of the wreck in this photo:
That should bring back memories to anyone who did Flag Officer Sea Training’s ‘weekly war’ – insanely long days, Hunters flying below masthead height and a few ales in the Green Shutters!
Thanks, @nooblord . Yep, see? Like I keep saying. The British love blowing up and sinking their own ships. 😀 Look at that lovely destroyer we gave them, USS Buchanan one of fifty vintage WW1 four-stackers. No no sooner do they rename her HMS Campbeltown than they pack her full of six tons of explosives and crash her into a German dry dock. 🙁 No seriously, though. Sinking ships like this might have been a serious tactic undertaken to deny the Germans use of port facilities like Dover, Folkestone, etc. This is important for the Germans since they really needed… Read more »
Another fantastic series @Oriskany, such a tremendous talent for this sort of thing! If it’s any consolation as I know you work bloody hard on your various article series, it’s been a crap few weeks for me and being able to wind down from the stresses of work and escape into the alternate reality of your scenarios really is doing a hell of a lot of good for me right now. Great work bud 🙂
Thanks very much, @bigdave – Sorry to hear you’r having a crap time with work. Holiday related? A lot of jobs go haywire this time of year. 😀 We also have our “support thread” going in the historical gaming forums if you’re interested. 😀 http://www.beastsofwar.com/groups/historical-games/forum/topic/operation-sea-lion-addl-content-games-participation/?topic_page=1&num=15 And as far as these articles go, we do have one more coming, where we try taking a closer look at these “what if” factors in greater detail and see what really would have made a difference, and what wouldn’t. Thanks very much for the very kind words. Comments like that really do help keep… Read more »
these are much fun to read 🙂 as for me taking Britan.. not much chance of that, even though I can almost take candy from children 😉
Yeah, we shouldn’t underestimate the British, @reiton . In a paratrooper game in our support thread, we had a section of Home Guard bicycles counterattack and destroy a platoon of elite German fallschirmjaegers. Absolutely should NOT have happened, I’ve worked through the math and the game odds are almost 1-200 against . . . but that’s the thing with wargames. Crazy stuff DOES happen sometimes. 😀
Thanks for the comment! 😀
never underestimate dads army. they’ll stick it up’em.
don’t discount the matilda I they had a big cast iron rail sleeper as a front axel.
a unexpected final battle @oriskany
I heard that, @zorg , as far as the Home Guard goes. And as far as the Matilda I goes . . . yeah it was tough. Just too slow and no heavy weapons. 🙁 The only thing compromising its armor plating (okay, beyond its riveted construction) was the long stretch of track exposed along the top. Antitank mine, anyone? 😀
one or two miner flaws? in a excellent tanket. @oriskany who do you think would win in one to one verses a PzI?
Well, honestly tank battles are not “jousting duels,” but just for fun . . . The PzKpfw I has slight advantages in weight and armor. But the Mark VIb is faster. Also, the PzKpfw I carries two 7.92mm machine guns. while the Mark VIb carries a .303 (almost the same thing) and a .50 cal, a much larger machine gun that can probably punch the PzKpfw I’s armor, certainly before the PzKpfw I’s 7.92mm MGs could penetrate the Mark VIb. Then of course there are the Mark VIc variants with a 15mm light autocannon. But if we start talking variants,… Read more »
Great great series of articles I have really enjoyed them so far. Such a wealth of gaming potential to explore.
I think we can all have thoughts on the decisions made by the Commanders as they can be based upon sound reason but where do you go for the Wehrmacht when you factor in the decision making of Hitler in defeat ? Some of those high ranking officers may not want to go back.
One things for certain I think our boys will be making a well earned brew.
Thanks, @huscarle – you write: “where do you go for the Wehrmacht when you factor in the decision making of Hitler in defeat ? Some of those high ranking officers may not want to go back.” A couple years ago a friend and I ran a 20-game series of PanzerBlitz, recreating “a year in the life” of Panzergrenadier Division Grossdeutschland. We created a simple, light campaign mechanic where victories could win you medals, promotions, additional units to your OOB, etc. Anyway, by the end (following history) we sure as shit didn’t want to surrender to the Soviets. So we did… Read more »
if he survived I think around 80% of them never came home after the war.
Exactly, @zorg – so we wanted our “characters” to surrender to the British. Because you’re right, German POW survival in Soviet Gulags was terrible, and even those few who made it back didn’t do so until 1950-55.
Lt. Colonel Hans von Luck has a telling segment in his biography about his experiences in a Soviet camp down in the Caucasus.
they certainly weren’t like prisons over here.
Well it’s something I’d not thought about until I read your articles. I have always assumed that Sea lion would fail but we would be in trouble if the they actually managed to get ashore and then not for long, as the enormity of keeping their invasion force supplied kicked in. I have never actually thought beyond that. Now I’m thinking just how far would Hitler have flogged a dead horse. How much would he have committed before the end. What exit strategy would he use ? We can hazard a guess at what he may have done from what… Read more »
Thanks, @huscarle . Regarding Hitler “flogging a dead horse,” we might take a guess using an example of “circumstantial evidence” from Hitler’s behavior vis-a-vis the “bridgehead” in Tunisia. Pretty stubborn and pigheaded, but air reinforcements and supply could kept up for quite a while over British-controlled seas in a long, protracted, losing, but ultimately doomed defense of a German bridgehead in Sussex and Kent (as they were in Tunisia). This campaign could have lasted who knows how long given the grievously under-strength British and Commonwealth armies at the time, certainly nothing like the Anglo American forces in Tunisia in late… Read more »
First up thank you kind sir for the mention. After spending the last few days looking at concrete and wooden armored cars those Matilda MK1’s are looking amazing and very high tech and the Mark 6 light tanks are looking like snow speeders out of Star Wars! Very interesting final games here @oriskany. So the fruit of Germany is dying on its own vine. Actually I had spent a little bit of time looking at the ongoing Channel battles. A force of cruisers hitting a flank engaging and drawing off the Germany Navy and Luftwaffe, allowing a couple of flotillas… Read more »
Wow if Mk VIbs look like snow speeders and A11 Matilda Is look high tech, you’re looking at some really old, improvised “military” gear. 😀 No worries about the mention, those Free French really were your idea. The balance I try to strike with these articles is how far in advance to write them. On the one hand, the ideal is to write them all, taking my sweet time, edit and re-edit and re-re-edit, submit them all, and sit back and watch them roll out. The disadvantage there is that I can’t “react” to reader input in successive articles. Back… Read more »
A great read even for someone who is only a part part time historical gamer! I love the drama of the s-day +20 writing and the tables look great, as always.
That lead paragraph wasn’t over the top? A little purple in the prose? 🙂
Having seen the Matilda close up at Bovington the suspension and front of the tracks as @oriskany says are highly vulnerable to HE and even sustained fire from an MG 42…The MkVI is one of my favourite tanks though I don’t think I would like to be in one during combat
Thanks @torros – Those Mark IVb light tanks are wicked fast on the tabletop in games like Battlegroup and Panzer Leader. Nothing better to run down fleeing Italian infantry at Sidi Barrani or Beda Fomm. 😀 As for the Matilda I . . . it’s tough to even get them into combat at those speeds, never mind hoping they perform well.
Thanks again @oriskany. Yep decreasing WW1 rifles, anti tank weapons that will kill half the county with the exception of your actual target, and being torn between using concrete or wood and pebbles for my Armoured trucks. Then your expecting me to get a handle on this late 1930’s super tech! 😉 I suppose leaving a number of games for the supporting thread would be another angle to react to people. These games may be at the fringes of the main storyline but would allow people to see their suggestions on the table or perhaps they post a small game… Read more »
I’ll be honest, @jamesevans140 – I usually keep running games (even is just small solitaire playtests) after the article series is complete, sometimes these are some of the games that appear in the support thread. Like the Penobscot game run for the American Revolution thread, or the fallschirmjaeger game recently featured on the Sea Lion thread (might run another one later today). I forgot to ask about your naval game. British cruisers drew off German convoy defense and allowed MBTs to swing in and sink some transports? An 8,000 tanker. That must have made a big fireball. I can see… Read more »
Pure genius, another brilliant series, thank you. All very strange seeing place names that are not too far from me. I have always wanted to play a game where I play the German side just to see what the outcome would be. Makes you wonder what would have happened if Germany was really serious about taking the UK and had planned for it properly in the mid thirties. A fleet of heavy bombers would have helped them I think. Looking forward to part 5 🙂 I just wish my Grandfather was still here, I would have got him to make… Read more »
Thanks very much, @minty45 . 😀 You write: “All very strange seeing place names that are not too far from me.” I remember a million years ago when the first Red Dawn movie came out about a Soviet-led invasion of the US . . . my friends and I were too young to see how silly it was, but we threw ourselves into at least a year of “green army man wargaming” and even some RPGs of first the Russians, and later the Cubans (after we moved to Florida) invading our home town. Moving the war to your own backyard… Read more »
Your reply to me appears like it got cut off. I lost about half of one of my replies to you. I have posted larger replies without this happening. Post of what I was looking at was this reverse strategy of the Luftwaffe in what they called the Channel War. Where they attack channel shipping to draw the RAF fighters out for an attritional series of battles. Here I am trying to draw the Germans into a series of battles that has two goals to achieve one main objective. The objective is to weaken the German military on British soil… Read more »
Ahh, @jamesevans140 . . . that’s my fault, not typing carefully at 2:00 AM. Often when I want to reply to a long, complex, or well-put post, I copy the original post into my window and then reply point-by-point. You’ll notice that the text that cut off was actually your text from the previous post. Anyway . . . Post of what I was looking at was this reverse strategy of the Luftwaffe in what they called the Channel War. Where they attack channel shipping to draw the RAF fighters out for an attritional series of battles. Right. This was… Read more »
Thanks for your in-depth reply @oriskany. I made this assumption this naval plan would occur after the German lodgement had been secured but preferably as the mechanized units had moved up to their assembly areas for the breakout. My plan is old school attritional warfare with a touch of B.H. Liddell Hart’s impaling them on the twin horns of dilemma. Always making the Germans decide between the Channel and the low lands between the coast and London at the cost of the other. Yes the RN ships a are good at night fighting with many of the newer classes equipped… Read more »
Awesome post, @jamesevans140 . I made this assumption this naval plan would occur after the German lodgement had been secured but preferably as the mechanized units had moved up to their assembly areas for the breakout. Oh, okay. I thought you might be trying to keep the mechanised (i.e., second wave) forces from landing in the first place, or at least landing intact (S-Day +2 or +3). Yes the RN ships a are good at night fighting with many of the newer classes equipped with early radar. The RN submarines are even better. The MTBs are in their element at… Read more »
Extremely good points @oriskany. Once the Germans have a bridgehead most safe Montgomery style plans are out the window. It is time for Patton style plans. I am not saying one general is better than the other, I am relying on the cliches attached to both to set a mind set. I have constructed this strategy from the point of view of a nation on the ropes and not a nation in its primacy. It considers a political turmoil, with explosive inter department rivalry, as well as, infighting within the department’s. This is why the battleships are being held back… Read more »
Good evening, @jamesevans140 – I agree completely with the German need for a quick win, and a fast Guderian-style breakout (This is a Patton-free zone, here – just kidding). 🙂 Going back as far as the Franco Prussian War in 1870-71, any German wins are fast wins. As soon as an enemy can stretch out a battle longer than a few months, the “Prussian General Staff” Germans are effectively doomed. Mons, Barbarossa, there are plenty of examples. So I foresee for Sea Lion the Germans making for an immediate mechanized breakout, driving either (a) for London, or if it was… Read more »
Very interesting theorising, but I would say the amphibious invasion would be a disaster for several reasons. 1) Every nation has underestimated the difficulty of an amphibious operation, Dieppe taught us a lot, but prior to that there were all kinds of crackpot ideas such as the US had a contingency plan to launch an amphibious assault as part of a possible war with Canada, it simply was hopelessly thought out. 2) Battleships were obsolete, but not ineffective. The problem they had was that they were a very expensive unit for their effectiveness, but early in the war (and even… Read more »