Skip to toolbar

Help with uniform identification please

Home Forums Historical Tabletop Game Discussions Help with uniform identification please

Supported by (Turn Off)

This topic contains 22 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by  elessar2590 5 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1415021

    ninjilly
    Participant
    11673xp

    Fantastic @damon thank you so much. Really looks good for it.

    #1415022

    Anonymous
    0xp

    @ninjilly, if the gentleman was born in 1837, that photo is at the earliest 1860 and he would have been some 23 year old to have that moustache and hair.  I would guess he is closer to 40 than 30 in the photo, so dating it to 1870s.

    #1415024

    ninjilly
    Participant
    11673xp

    Yeah, once she gave me his birth date, 1850s was clearly too early. By 1881 is is out of the Marines and remarried. There’s no death to be found yet but she’s only just starting down this side of the family tree. It was really more to identify which man it was as the photo was in her own mum’s belongings.

    #1415025

    torros
    23816xp
    Cult of Games Member

    Going for a bit of a stab in the dark based on the stripe on the trousers  and the Austrian  knot  and say  maybe military  foot police

    #1415062

    brucelea
    7906xp
    Cult of Games Member

    Just to throw my basic knowledge into the mix, the artillery and engineers were sister regiments and I would agree with @damon that the uniform is a match for artillery units. The bombs on the collar look like they only have one spread of flames (usually 7 for artillery) and the stripes on the trousers should be red if it’s an artillery related uniform, the cuff detailing matches the style I’m familiar with but I couldn’t be accurate on how they differentiate between units. The real identifying feature would be the belt buckle but I can’t make out anything. It’s not uncommon though for No1 dress to have a belt in the same cloth as the rest of the uniform, or plain leather, as well as a more formal white belt (stops you getting blanco all over your uniform when you’re not on parade). My thoughts would lead towards Royal Marine Artillery.

    #1415063

    brucelea
    7906xp
    Cult of Games Member

    6794F696-6C36-4100-9183-FAE3ED1C475B

    Just found this, it’s for Royal Marines and their artillery units and it would seem to match the shape of the outline of the one in the photo.

    #1415065

    oriskany
    60771xp
    Cult of Games Member

    @ninjilly – yeah, definitely go with @damon and @brucelea on this one.  My apologies, I did not know that artillery within Royal Marines had a separate insignia for their collar device.

    #1415068

    elessar2590
    18207xp
    Cult of Games Member

    If I can add my own 2 cents I would put him at the end of his career and possibly about to retire sometime after 1880.

    He appears to be wearing the Blue Serge Jacket that was adopted for the Anglo-Egyptian Campaign (came in before it but was first used in 82) and replaced with a Grey Alternative in 84 for the Mahdist War.

    Here’s a picture of RMA in Egypt 1882 for comparison.

    N.2-Battery-Royal-Artillery-Broken-Wheel
    1880-1900
    He appears to be wearing the Dress Uniform Version as seen of the man second from the right or a version of it possibly an earlier variety at the start of the decade.

    That would make him about 45ish in this photo if it was taken in 1880-81.

Viewing 8 posts - 16 through 23 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Supported by (Turn Off)