World War Infantry Galore from Wargames Factory
March 8, 2012 by brennon
The 15mm Late World War II German Infantry are now available from Wargames Factory. And if your not a 15mm wargamer, there are some 28mm surprises coming from them as well...
The set is available from the store here. But like I said, if your wanting something 28mm then check out these German Infantry in a larger scale...
And if your more of an Allied player then Wargames Factory are bringing out some Late World War II American Infantry.
Some great cheap miniatures once again from Wargames Factory. If your looking for a bulk of miniature to fill out your force then this could be the manufacturer to look too.
Will you be getting any of these World War II models?
Interesting…from the larger scale pics and the German 15mm box art it looks like they’re reusing the CGI for 28mm with the figs split into more pieces – if you have the existing assets in a high enough detail that’s fine, but if they were designed for 15mm originally then it might not be good enough for ‘God’s own scale’. Time will tell I think.
Also…not a fan of that US box art. It looks like primitive 90’s CGI animation stills – the expression is much like a bad waxwork. The box also needs to say ‘tank not included’ again.
Yer the box art for the US troopers does look like the cover of a bad video game. Despite that, I think the models should be pretty good from them. I am constantly surprised at how good they actually are.
BoW Ben
i am very happy. was gutted when the germans were 15mm. first 28mm us figures more than makes up for it
Love ammo belt as a sash look, real gun ho!
Those are very nice looking germans.
I would like to see 15mm Germans instead of the box and pictures of 28mm figures.
Got to say I’m still not a fan of WF figures. I don’t know what it is they just don’t look right, they look like shop mannequins to me.
I am seriously considering taking the plunge and getting hold of the 15mm Germans, although I do share huscarle’s concerns regarding WF’s figures based upon what I have seen of them so far.
Also, Brennon on a (I’m sure you will consider) pedantic grammatical point, delete ‘your’ and insert either ‘you are’ or less formally – and probably more contextually appropriate in this context – ‘you’re’.
Thanks 😉 !