Home › Forums › 3D Printing for Tabletop Gaming › 3D printing getting moneytized
Tagged: Bambu Lab
This topic contains 8 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by limburger 2 hours, 25 minutes ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
January 18, 2025 at 9:55 am #1912332
So two days ago Bambu Lab posted this article:
https://blog.bambulab.com/firmware-update-introducing-new-authorization-control-system-2/
This basically boils down to “any software that is not authorized [aka made by us and bought by you] will not work once you’ve upgraded your firmware”. Making every 3rd party software useless on a Bambu Lab printer.
Now, I’m pretty sure there where already 3D printer companies who did this day 1 with any printer and that is ok. If you (as a producer of 3D printers) want to make sure hard- and software work together 100% than that is fine. As long as you’re open and upfront about it.
But building your brand on openness and than taking that away. That’s bad. Yet they will do that as that way down lies the options to monetize on 3D files.
Imagine you need to buy a printer from brand “BL” because their firmware works in tandem with 3D files from miniature company “GW” because of copyright protections and limited print runs? Buy an STL but you’re only allowed to print it 3 times.
That’s where this is going. And other 3D printer companies will follow. Because DRM makes money. And after all: companies want to make money.
On the other hand I think Bambu Lab printers will be had for cheap now on ebay the next few days? 😉
January 18, 2025 at 10:05 am #1912333Hmm, that does come across as a shady move by Bamboo Labs. Honestly though, DRM has long been proven to do jack & shit to prevent piracy, in many cases doing the opposite and causing it to spike as folks get hacked off by DRM impeding their enjoyment of a product they have legally brought. I doubt any move to implement the same amongst the 3D printing community will fair any better….
January 18, 2025 at 10:08 am #1912334Honestly though, DRM has long been proven to do jack & shit to prevent piracy, in many cases doing the opposite and causing it to spike as folks get hacked off by DRM impeding their enjoyment of a product they have legally brought.
True but that won’t stop greedy corpo from trying. It’ll be the 1980s again with cracked files, WareZ sites and mates exchanging USB sticks. Maybe even a 3D printer Demo scene? XD
January 18, 2025 at 10:11 am #1912335January 18, 2025 at 1:53 pm #1912367Someone will always find a way around this stuff. For good or bad, just like the great Metallica vs Napster war foretold the coming of streaming, and in the end, corporations will make all their money, and artists get screwed. Metallica wasn’t wrong.
January 18, 2025 at 3:14 pm #1912368The difference being: this time most artists already sell their stuff on their own without the need of lables like the music industry had back in the day of CD and vinyl records. Corpos might try it (like G’Wullu will likely do) but most 3D artists will be fine in the long run.
January 18, 2025 at 3:29 pm #1912370Hate this sort of thing. I had an Epson printer that refused to work with cheap cartridges… had to be epson only. It’s why I have a black and white laser now.
My Lumix digital camera with chargeable battery can use ‘other brand’ batteries. Friend bought the newer model of camera a few years later and found that it would only accept Lumix batteries that cost four, or five times more.
Mobile phones have built in batteries now so you can’t replace them yourself.
Contrary to what was said in the movie Wall Street by Gordon Gecko… “Greed is not good!”
January 18, 2025 at 4:46 pm #1912373January 18, 2025 at 5:07 pm #1912377Bambu Labs and ‘open’ ?
nah, that’s never the impression I got from them.
The way they push their ‘cloud based’ solution for ‘sharing’ designs has always made me feel like they were one step away from pulling a stunt like this. I want a printer that prints when I want it and how I want it. I do not want a device that needs to ask permission from the big server in the sky to do its job.Other brands appear to either have designs based on ‘open source’ constructs or embrace that aspect by letting their customers modify everything in their printers.
I’m soo not surprised that this is being sold as a ‘security’ feature either.
When companies can’t blame piracy they use that as an excuse to limit our options as owners of the devices we buy from them.Only thing I can understand is that they’d want to limit warranty when devices use non-standard firmware or upgrades.
But that’s because it’s easier to diagnose faults when you can either rule out software issues or at least compare said issues with a regular production model.It’s sad to see a company with printers that are as close to plug&play as these do things like this.
They were the one option I was considering …I wonder if this is a possible response to the recent news from the USA where they want background checks for users because the morons think these things can print viable firearms.
Keep in mind that ordinary 2D printers and copiers already have built-in restrictions that prevent them from printing/copying money. I suspect that as 3D printing becomes easier to use and more widespread we will see similar stupidity enforced.
https://wiki.bambulab.com/en/security-incidents-cloud-traffic?ref=blog.bambulab.com
This is the actual reason. Their cloud-services can’t handle the amount of “unauthorized” traffic that’s happening.
It’s not about actual security that affects end-users.
It’s about them trying to find excuses for their sh!ttty design.I’ve seen this happen with home automation as well were certain companies would use ‘security’ as an excuse when in reality their software was overloading their servers.
- This reply was modified 2 hours, 21 minutes ago by limburger.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.