Skip to toolbar

Reply To: The Cult of Lard

Home Forums News, Rumours & General Discussion The Cult of Lard Reply To: The Cult of Lard

#1839259

osbad
4279xp
Cult of Games Member

I think we may have to disagree on Discourse.  I agree her titles are somewhat click-baity.  However, she isn’t unrelentingly negative – she often points out positive things when she finds them.  She does admit that negativity sells, and it seems many don’t get beyond the titles with her.  I guess one’s opinion about Discourse may be the mirror opposite of one’s opinion of GW.  Personally, I don’t have much time for GW these days, which maybe means her base opinions may resonate with mine, even though I don’t buy the hyperbole.

However, I think GW is big enough and bad enough to defend itself without the need for keyboard warriors calling her every nasty name under the sun! 😀  Of course if one is looking for validation of one’s opinions and one is generally a GW fan, then I can see how she may be irritating.  And whatever, if someone lives by click-baiting on the back of a large company, then they shouldn’t get too bent out of shape if there is something of an overreaction from the fanbase of GW.

And that last comment makes me wonder.  I guess the emotive content in debates often comes from those who consider themselves “fans” of a company rather than just “customers”.  i.e. they believe there is some closer “loyalty” relationship. This leads folks to defend what they are a fan of, whereas a customer may just shrug their shoulders and say “meh!”

Supported by (Turn Off)