Home › Forums › Historical Tabletop Game Discussions › 20mm WW2 Waffen SS Winter Infantry
This topic contains 15 replies, has 4 voices, and was last updated by jamesevans140 4 years, 7 months ago.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 17, 2020 at 2:22 am #1513691April 17, 2020 at 5:13 am #1513696
They look great @piers. It looks unusual to see the SS in just one colour, but I find it refreshing. Now we have seen T-34s and now the SS in winter dress, so are these the prelude to the pending release of the Stalingrad rules for Battlegroup?
Another question for you. Northag is it a completely different rules set or does it share and or extend the Battlegroup rules? I see a number of modern 10mm scale vehicles are being released from The Plastic Soldier Company. Are these for Northag. Does this mean Northag will be optimized for 10mm in a similar manner to Battlegroup is optimized to 20mm, yes I know it can be used with other scales.
For the moment our group is reduced to building and painting new armies, scenery and adding improved paint jobs to older armies.
April 17, 2020 at 3:27 pm #1514003NorthAG are very similar to Battlegroup with a few changes.
They are designed for 6mm to 15mm.
No Waffen SS at Stalingrad, and the Oakleaf reversible suits weren’t issued till October 44 so these are very much late war.
April 18, 2020 at 2:09 am #1514120Wow ! Nice paint job .
April 18, 2020 at 8:48 am #1514146Thanks @piers. I think smaller scales seems to work better with moderns given the kill distances. There is a club here in Canberra that play Team Yankee using GHQ 1/285 Micro Armor. It looks much better than 15mm models.
“IN” the city of Stalingrad quite true there were no SS. However I may have made the dangerous assumption that the upcoming Stalingrad supplement covered a time period and not just a location. Personally from a historian point of view I don’t really like Stalingrad as it is somewhat of a black hole with its gravitational forces pulling the attention of historians to it at the cost of many other battles along Eastern Front. Manstein referred to it as a vain struggle. The crossing of the Volga would have been much easier at Saratov to the North of Stalingrad which was far less defensible for the Russians, but because it was Stalin’s town.
Personally I want to get back into true historical gaming. At the moment the group seems fascinated in a fictional timeline of a new war that started mid 45 in Poland when British and Soviet forces accidentally exchanged fire and Churchill’s plan to attack the Russians became public. I am surprised just how evenly matched the two army’s are. An IS-2 does not handle a hit from an improved disguarding sabot round from a 17 pounder. Before this series of games ,my money would have been on the Russians. Currently the British are winning by one game who are being commanded by our least experienced player.
Getting back to the main point I greatly like the “earthy” look to these figures and the T-34s that you previously posted. I am looking forward to seeing more work from you along these lines. 🙂
April 18, 2020 at 10:02 am #1514208Lovely work buddy, have you done any tutorials of how you paint infantry in the projects?
April 18, 2020 at 10:56 am #1514268Yes have done a few painting guides.
@jamessevens140
BG Stalingrad will be the 1942 supplement for the ost front, but those figures likely wont be in it as mainly late war types.
BG also doesnt distinguish between Waffen SS and Heer formations really.
April 18, 2020 at 1:50 pm #1514372Awesome do you have a link to one, please? Went back through your Northag and Battlegroup projects but they are mainly galleries with build shots.
April 18, 2020 at 4:08 pm #1514428Only have them in PDF these days from when I used to sell them
Drop me a PM and I will email you an copy.
April 18, 2020 at 8:25 pm #1514511April 19, 2020 at 7:04 am #1514608@piers you spiked my curiosity so I consulted my copy of Warren SS Camouflage Uniforms & Post-war Derivatives by Daniel Peterson. At a squeeze you could use these figures for battles in the second half of 42 if you wanted and still be historically accurate. The Panzer Faust and assault rifles still remain an issue. A SS-Eichenlaubmuster reversible smock was introduced in 42. It states that this is not to be confused with the SS-Eichenlaubmuster patterns of 43/44. From what I can see the 42 pattern has sharper edges on the pattern.
Just like the late war panzers are pushing the limits of technology it appears that SS Camouflage patterns are doing the same printed/dyed uniforms as there is much variance between manufacturers. I must admit that this series of books are aimed at the very serious re-enacters. These guys are completely anal retentive about the small details. Such as the Y harness they date by year from the cut and stitching of it. They can usually tell you what year a modern reproduction was made. For myself being far more interested in doctrine I have only covered the bare basics of uniforms. I collected this series of books for painting reference. But let’s face it, trying to reproduce these variances between different SS-EICHENLAUBMUSTER prints are impossible in 15mm or 20mm scale. I would not attempt it under 120mm scale.
April 19, 2020 at 7:57 am #1514609Sorry @piers i forgot to mention in my last reply that i totally agree with BG not distinguishing between the SS and other Heer formations. The SS super trooper is a myth. Even my own research of them quickly found them to be a very mixed bag, even over time. Such as the SS 6th Mountain Division in Finland dropped their equipment and stampeded nearly 50km before their officers could bring them under control when they were fired upon for the first time. Yet this same division gave the Americans so much trouble after the battle of the Bulge. The foreign SS divisions were hardly as good as the Luftwaffe field divisions.
We tend to look at a SS division’s performance for a given battle and adjust their stats based upon it. Such as the 5th SS division on the Eastern front tended to be very wasteful with their men for little gains to show for it. To reflect this we lower the points cost for the unit and adjust their saving rolls to be lower than other units. We look at other factors such as with the high turnover of troops we list them as being greener than other SS units. So overall our SS units on the average are just normal German units with more and or better equipment.
April 19, 2020 at 10:33 am #1514655Problem is they are in the padded reversible suit, not a smock.
It of course depends how anal you are… and I am a fair bit! 😉
The reversible parkas started out in a white/mouse grey colour for Waffen SS, but in the winter of 43/44 they used a field grey to Spring oakleaf combination.
For the following winter 44/45 it was decided to change to a white and autumn Oakleaf or blurred edge.
So for the ‘purist’ these really are purely aimed at from October 44 onwards. Some are wearing the old Mouse Grey clothing as remaining stocks were issued in 44/45.
You could of course paint the figures in white suits for snow camo suits, or one of the other options. I went with the 44/45 look as it suits what I intend to use them for.
Of course the greatcoat chaps are grand for 43 onwards… all wear the small ankle boot and gaiter which puts them generally in the post 43 period.
April 20, 2020 at 5:29 am #1515035Thanks for a great reply @piers. I must admit for myself I am truly anal retentive, but I don’t expect it from others.
Such as if you brought these figures to my place to play a game set in France 1940 I would let it pass and only complementing on how great they look. For me I could not do it. The out of time figures would annoy the hell out of me. So I know exactly where you are coming from. The problem is that if not controlled anal retentiveness can kill enthusiasm in others, they feel that nothing is good enough for us. So my approach to others is to in a case like this to allow the small details to pass and even expand it. Such as who cares if we use these figures in 1940. After a while I will see a period they prefer such as battles of 43 in Italy. I would start encouraging to paint within that period, like showing them colour plates of SS wearing Italian camouflage. So hopefully they find it cool to paint historically accurate. It does not matter to me if they don’t have the correct colour either. If it persists I may buy them the correct colours as a present. The Panzer Fausts and assault rifles I could not let pass in a 1940. Like I hate and can’t stand documentaries on the fall of France and they insist on showing the clip of the inspection of the King Tiger Battalion. Like really!!! They were not even a designer’s dream in 1940.
So given this it is the norm for me to open up possibilities of play for figures like these rather then pin someone to an exact date. Hopefully without sounding condescending as that is not my intention. For me on the other hand I near bought shares in the Plastic Soldier Company for my next project a US army from 42 to 45. Due to my anal retentive issues I have nearly 80 Sherman tanks in the cupboard. Simply because I really cannot bring myself to use M4A1s when M4s were historically used. Because of the my German collection is growing fast in Pz-IIIs and IVs is growing fast for the same reason.
On another thing may I complement you on painting the uncovered helmets grey. It really adds to the atmosphere. It seems to me that grey helmets are somewhat out of fashion with many painters who prefer to use dark green or yellow.
Again thanks for the reply, I am off to start weathering my T-44 that can’t be used with your figures because it it winter.
April 20, 2020 at 5:42 pm #1515292I’m anal about WW2… and so are my gaming group. We do let things slide of course, but we all try to be reasonably accurate… hence I have so many German armies!
As for helmets… I have several rivet counter books with nothing but pics of original Stalhelms. Quite the mix of colours. My last Normandy platoon of Germans got quite the exotic mix of helmet colours and camo patterns.
-
AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.