Home › Forums › News, Rumours & General Discussion › Is it time for some more critical analysis of rule sets › Reply To: Is it time for some more critical analysis of rule sets
The one thing I never ever want to see in a review are scores, because (A) nobody ever agrees with the reviewer (it’s either too high or too low) and(B) makes a good game with a fixable flaw as good as a bad game with a brilliant feature
All that’s needed is a summary of pros and cons. Let the reader decide whether that makes it worth buying or not.
Hiding reviews behind a paywall makes no sense at all, because the ones that could benefit the most may not be a member when they stumble upon it. And there’s nothing worse than discovering a detailed review only to be told you need to pay or else …
I’d also argue that any company willing to blacklist sites/reviewers because they didn’t give their game a positive review is a publisher that’s worth avoiding as they can’t handle honest critique.
It will be interesting to see how GW is going to respond to more in-depth reviews especially given that OTT is selling GW products these days. I hope GW have learned from their mistakes …